Monday, 16 June 2008

Oakland A's new stadium


After almost 40 years of playing at McAfee Coliseum, and for the first time in five years, the Oakland A's announced plans in November 2006 to build a new ballpark in Fremont, CA. After approval from Alameda County and the City of Fremont, the ballpark will be built on a 143 acre tract of land located on the west side of Interstate 880 off of Auto Mall Parkway. Cisco Systems purchased the naming rights to the ballpark for $4million per year over 30 years.
Cisco Field will resemble old classic ballparks of the past while combining the most advanced technology in the world. The ballpark will be the smallest in Major League Baseball, seating up to 34,000 fans. The main three tier grandstand will extend from the left field foul pole to homeplate, and down the first baseline to right field. Additional seating will be found in both right and left field. The break down of seating will consist of field level box seats, 66 four person mini seats 15 rows behind homeplate, lower reserved seats, 41 16 person suites, and rooftop box seats. The main video/scoreboard will be located beyond the left/centerfield fence. A videoboard will be located on the opposite side of the main videoboard allowing fans outside the ballpark to view video of the A's. Early estimates had the ballpark originally opening in 2009 and later 2011. In April 2008, the A's announced that the earliest Cisco Field would open is 2012.
Estimated cost of the ballpark is between $400-$500 million. The anticipated funding for the ballpark will be a combination of private equity and the application of the value of land use entitlements that will be generated by the activities of the ballpark and the adjacent ballpark village developments. The public assistance sought will be in the form of processing the development activity in the most efficient manner possible, the agreement that benefits generated solely by the development will in part or in total be used to facilitate the development program in a manner that will not impose on General Fund or Bonding issues on local government and other aspects of public-private cooperation that will stand the test of public acceptance.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home